reactorpic.jpg

August 28, 2002

Some folks are really worth admiring

Many years ago I was advised never to write about religion or politics. Good advice! If I'd listened to the part about politics, this column would have appeared rarely these past decades, pleasing my critics no end. I've touched on religion only sparingly over the years, however.

It isn't that religion isn't important. Perhaps it's too important to be beaten back and forth in letters to the editor and columns of opinion that can't cover the subject properly. Perhaps also, I'm afraid that either I'll give good advice that won't be followed or, worse, bad advice that will. It's also a fact I've vastly admired the character of many whose life has centered on their religion, whatever it might be. And I've viewed others whose life was devoted to religiosity. They were more interested in telling others what they should believe and how they should express those beliefs. Some in that second group have gotten under my skin from time to time. One (his name was Joe) visited jails to pass out Catholic religious tracts. Perhaps he intended to be kind and do the prisoners some good. Or perhaps it just gave him an ego boost. I can't know what was actually in his mind? So far as I know, he never tried to help any released prisoners get a job or even, perhaps, practice to improve their reading and writing. He may have felt holier giving out tracts, but I doubt any prisoners actually led better lives.

Another man (coincidentally also named Joe) heard his niece was marrying a Catholic. He wrote, saying if she went through with it she was bound for hell. He didn't know enough about her to be aware she was actually Catholic herself (and obviously farther along the road to perdition than he was aware?)

By contrast I've known scores of fine persons who've been outstanding examples of the good that is in each of their religions. Catholics, Jews, Mormons, Unitarians, Fundamentalist Christians, Christian Scientists, all admirably doing their best to live good lives and follow the precepts they'd been taught. I remember, not ostentatious religiosity, but their charity, their gentleness, their kindness, their generosity, the love they showed their families and others.

It seems unlikely God would simultaneously prefer all the teachings of Catholicism, Mormonism, Christian Science, Fundamentalist Protestantism, Lutheranism, Anglicanism, and several varieties of Judaism. They can't all be completely right. There are just too many contradictions between religions. At least an agnostic acknowledges his ignorance. And atheism is pointless. Organized, diligent atheism is an exercise in futility, like a major league baseball game where the scorekeeper has a severe case of Alzheimer's and no one else keeps track of the stats.

At least in this country we can choose our own religion. It's preferable we choose rather than have it forced on us by some dumb king, emperor or czar. Forced atheism is worse, as in the old Soviet Union. Being a Swede used to mean you were Lutheran. Spaniards and Portuguese were Catholics. Individual Germans became whatever some petty princeling decided. Those who obstinately insisted on choosing how to worship sometimes lost heads or were burned at stakes.

I don't know much about Mark Reynolds or Lou Shapiro or others who push their views via letters to the editor. I hope God is pleased with them all, though I've a gut feeling He's more pleased with them, if He actually happens to be, for whatever kindness, charity, gentleness and love they have for their fellow man, rather than any particular mindset of theology, ideas and beliefs they'd like to sell the rest of us.

Paul Azevedo particularly appreciates the kindness and generosity of the person who gave him the gift of his e mail address, Paul@thereactor.net. Check his website at www.thereactor.net.

 
[This Week] [2002 Archive] [2001 Archive] [2000 Archive] [1999 Archive] [1998 Archive]